![]() |
||
When at a A.A. meeting, how do you introduce yourself?
Recently, at an A.A. meeting, I introduced myself and qualified by saying the following:
This of course is not your typical A.A. introduction. In fact, I was interrupted by the chairperson of the meeting and was told quite curtly, "we have no time for this kind of sharing" and promptly asked someone else to share. "Hi, my name is...and I'm an alcoholic"."Hi, my name is... and I'm an alcoholic" is of course the more traditional way of introducing oneself at a meeting. However, I have never been comfortable with this approach. The language of this approach is negative-- it reinforces the problem rather than the solution. A description of what an alcoholic is can be found on page 44 of our Big Book which states: "If, when you honestly want to, you find you cannot quit entirely, or if when drinking, you have little control over the amount you take, you are probably alcoholic." An alcoholic is someone who cannot stop drinking, no matter what they do. They are beyond human aid -- they are hopeless -- powerless to stop. How did the early members of A.A. introduce themselves when gathered together? If you listen to recordings of the original A.A. pioneers, none of them identify themselves in this manner. If you listen to recordings of Bill W. and Dr.. Bob, you will hear that they never used this approach to introducing themselves. If you search the A.A. Grapevine archives online, the earliest reference of member identification is: September 1944, Vol. 1 No. 4, entitled "Points of View". "Dear Grapevine: Today I received my first copy of Grapevine, and have just enjoyed reading it through. I am a member of Alcoholics Anonymous--Quincy group." - George L., Quincy, Massachusetts This is the approach that our Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous suggests. In the Forward to the First Edition of the Big Book, Alcoholics Anonymous, it defines an A.A. member as:
This was the unique distinction that gave A.A. such an overwhelming notoriety -- seemingly hopeless alcoholics who could not stop drinking were recovered as a result of A.A.'s simple program. The tradition of identifying oneself at a meeting as an alcoholic is referenced in an early article from the A.A. Grapevine, March 1948, Vol. 4 No. 10, entitled, "Bottoms Up!" "A friend who has had quite a bit of speaking experience in A.A. recently ran into an amusing situation because of the same A.A. speaking habits. He was attending a business convention of all the important bigwigs of his firm and was unexpectedly called upon to address the convention. Unprepared but unflustered, he stood up and spontaneously said, "My name is Joe Doakes and I am an alcoholic!" -- A.P. This humorous note would seem to infer that the tradition of introducing yourself as an alcoholic started early in A.A.'s history. Are there any old-timers out there that know the answer as to why members switched from introducing themselves as "a member of Alcoholics Anonymous" to "I am an alcoholic"? Perhaps, it was hard in those early days for someone to admit they were an alcoholic. After-all the Big Book devotes the first 43 pages to the subject of Step One. Maybe it was helpful in those early days to hear A.A. members declare themselves as alcoholics in the meetings, thereby creating a safe environment for the newcomer to declare their Step One. Today, I do not think there much stigma attached nor resistance to announcing yourself as an alcoholic. In fact, in some societal circles such as Hollywood and the music industry that it is the trendy thing to do. From a marketing standpoint, the artists spin doctors certainly seem to exploit it to garner publicity. Remember Mel Gibson, Amy Winehouse, just to mention a few celebrity types? Lately, I have been introducing myself as an "intelligent agent -- a spearhead of God's ever advancing creation" but that's another article. How do you introduce yourself at meetings? As a "Member of Alcoholics Anonymous"? As a "Recovered Alcoholic"? As a "Recovering Alcoholic"? Remember, we recover by the steps we take NOT the meetings we make! It only takes a few hours to learn "how it works" and a lifetime to practice it. Download this FREE 12 Step workbook that guides the newcomer through all 12 steps in 4 hours! Looking for a Big Book Sponsor: Leave a message at: 416-533-6024. Want to get working on your program today? Listen to Joe and Charlie talk about the original 12 Step format that produced a 50% to 75% recovery rate from alcoholism/addiction during the 1940's. |
||
The second is out of context because the context is “speaking publically” as in on TV or radio, or to a non A.A. crowd. The third quote is a tradition and I have no idea how it even supports the idea of the article.
Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the article and agree with the premise. I just feel he weakens the credibility of the piece with those quotes. Much in the same way Dick has no credibility with me when he asserts that the Bible is true, should be used in AA, and if it were we would have people being cured again like the early timers.
Again, I am sure Dick has more time-in studying AA history than I, but is it “studying” or is it looking for evidence to support his preconceived notion. I am equally guilty of doing this, so don’t think I am just pointing fingers. I don’t believe the Bible is “the truth” but I know I am recovered from alcoholism because of the power I found in the Twelve Steps. The early AA’s realized that their cure was more like a remission when they had some relapses - sometimes because they didn’t fully submit themselves, sometimes because the stopped practicing the Steps and sometimes for no explainable reason. A cure, it was not.
Indeed I turned my life over to an idea of God, took the prescribed Steps of the program and I am now free of the desire to drink. I have recovered.
When at a meeting “I am an alcoholic, my home group is Thursday Night Study Group, and my name is Brian.” When asked to speak I am learning to use my full name.
I want people to hear what I have to say, and I find that other introductions raise people’s prejudice. I don’t go to A.A. to be right. I go to help other alcoholics because my recovery depends on it. If I am there to impose my view on the Group then I should stay home because that is not an appropriate reason to go to a meeting.
Take it from someone who witnessed AA change from a weak and watered down group therapy to a vibrant, god loving, awe inspiring program of “Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps we carried this message…” This was not accomplished by arguing with the people who “were doing it wrong” but by just helping the next alcoholic. How? By sharing with them and gaining their trust. By looking like just another member, but delivering a powerful A.A. message straight out of the book as a sponsor. Then he told two friends, and so on, and so on…
I was taught that membership in A.A. is at the group level. So saying my home group is where I declare my membership. The AA Group is a marvelous thing. If you really want to be a member of A.A. then join a group. Otherwise you are a spectator – not a member.
Who was the first to start a meeting or a qualification with the statement, "I am an alcoholic"? How did the worldwide custom begin? As late co-founder Bill W. used to observe, "Nobody invented A.A., it just grew." And so probably did its classic introduction at meetings. "Many members ask us these questions," says a G.S.O. staff member. "Unfortunately, only a few of the early timers are left, and not many of them are able to provide plausible theories. So we can only speculate."
According to an early friend of A.A., the late Henrietta Seiberling, the expression dates back to meetings of A.A.'s forerunner, the Oxford Group Movement, which had its heyday in the early 1930s. Mrs. Seiberling, a nonalcoholic who had sought spiritual help in the Oxford Group meetings, introduced Bill to A.A.'s other founder, Dr. Bob, then struggling to get sober in the Oxford Group.
At small meetings, the members knew one another and didn't need to identify themselves. But in the large, "public" meetings, where there was "witnessing" along the lines of an A.A. talk today, personal identification became necessary. Chances are that someone at some time said, "I am an alcoholic," but Mrs. Seiberling wasn't sure. Nor did she remember that the phrase was used at early A.A. meetings in Akron, before publication of the Big Book. In fact, she said, the word "alcoholic" was rarely uttered, at least in Akron. People referred to themselves as "drunks" or "rum hounds" or "boozers" or other choice epithets reminiscent of the Temperance Movement that gained adherents during Prohibition. An early New York A.A. first heard the expression as "I am an alcoholic and my name is ...." According to his recollection, that was after World War II, in 1945 or 1946. And it is a matter of record that, in 1947, a documentary film entitled, I Am an Alcoholic, was produced by RKO Pathe.
From then on, as Bill might say, the custom "just grew."
Box 4-5-9, October/November 2007
I will find out where I read this information and post it back here.